[Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting open on-line research)
Pars Mutaf
pars.mutaf
Thu Nov 3 05:46:04 EDT 2011
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Emmanuel Lochin
<emmanuel.lochin at gmail.com>wrote:
> On 3 November 2011 09:45, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Usman,
> >
> > The method you are suggesting means that we need to wait 6 months for
> > feedback (3-5 reviews).
>
> Hi Pars,
>
> Why do you think it would be faster with your proposal?
> I saw that you requested a review for one of your paper, but how long
> you expect to get real reviews? I mean, not from your friends,
> colleagues or collaborators.
> Who is going to stand whether the reviewer is skilled or not?
> If the reviewer is not anonymous, who would risk to send a review that
> might be qualified as bad by the author or another person?
>
> I think you should clearly expose the rules of your system, I really
> do not understand how does it work.
>
Hi Emmanuel,
Normally you should come with answer not questions (it is not only my
idea).
I mean: Question the current system not the new one to come.
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/replacing-scientific-conferences-with-a-cheap-and-effic.html
Pars
>
> Regards,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
> > Pars
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Usman Ashraf <
> m_usman_ashraf at hotmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> Is there a point that I'm missing? why don't we just submit our work to
> a
> >> reputed journal for feedback?
> >> Most reputed journals don't charge anything, don't cost as much as
> >> conferences and provide us with a decent feedback.
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Usman.
> >>
> >> > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:43:11 +0200
> >> > From: pars.mutaf at gmail.com
> >> > To: touch at isi.edu
> >> > CC: tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> >> > Subject: [Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting
> open
> >> on-line research)
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Could you please send feedback for the following work. I don't want to
> >> > submit it to conferences just for feedback. I would therefore need
> your
> >> > opinion:
> >> >
> >> > http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5115
> >> >
> >> > Or, please point me to me to a list working on this kind of topic.
> >> >
> >> > Pars
> >> >
> >> > PS: Based on the below idea, this is a test for open research.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 11/1/2011 11:37 PM, Pars Mutaf wrote:
> >> > > ...
> >> > >
> >> > > Conferences may have the benefits that are listed above. The
> problem is
> >> > >> being tied to conferences just for receiving feedback.
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > It's useful to appreciate that it has always been possible to write
> >> drafts
> >> > > and tech reports and post them - either via direct email, or to
> lists*
> >> for
> >> > > discussion or feedback.
> >> > >
> >> > > *This list in particular is intended for exactly this kind of
> >> discussion;
> >> > > we are often overrun with CFPs, but they is NOT the primary
> motivation
> >> for
> >> > > this list.*
> >> > >
> >> > > Joe (TCCC Chair)
> >> > >
> >> > > *it's more useful to post only the abstract, not the full text or
> PDF
> >> FWIW.
> >> > >
> >> > > *there are many IEEE Comsoc TCs; it's always useful to post your
> ideas
> >> to
> >> > > the TC most specific to your work.
> >> > >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications
> >> > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication.
> >> > Tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> >> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications
> > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication.
> > Tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally
> privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
> use
> or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
> messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
> data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
> amendment. This notice should not be removed"
>
More information about the TCCC
mailing list