[Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting open on-line research)
Reda Yaich
yaich
Thu Nov 3 05:04:31 EDT 2011
Hi all,
The European funded project LiquidPub [*] seems a good way to get quick
and interactive feedback (I've already participated to such initiative
[**]).
The idea would be to organize virtual conferences then to submit mature
papers to journals/reviews.
Regards,
Reda
* http://liquidpub.org/
**
http://www.interdisciplines.org/conferences/Workshop-on-Trust-and-Reputation
Le 03/11/11 09:45, Pars Mutaf a ?crit :
> Hi Usman,
>
> The method you are suggesting means that we need to wait 6 months for
> feedback (3-5 reviews).
>
> Pars
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Usman Ashraf<m_usman_ashraf at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Is there a point that I'm missing? why don't we just submit our work to a
>> reputed journal for feedback?
>> Most reputed journals don't charge anything, don't cost as much as
>> conferences and provide us with a decent feedback.
>>
>> regards
>> Usman.
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:43:11 +0200
>>> From: pars.mutaf at gmail.com
>>> To: touch at isi.edu
>>> CC: tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
>>> Subject: [Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting open
>> on-line research)
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Could you please send feedback for the following work. I don't want to
>>> submit it to conferences just for feedback. I would therefore need your
>>> opinion:
>>>
>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5115
>>>
>>> Or, please point me to me to a list working on this kind of topic.
>>>
>>> Pars
>>>
>>> PS: Based on the below idea, this is a test for open research.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Joe Touch<touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/1/2011 11:37 PM, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Conferences may have the benefits that are listed above. The problem is
>>>>> being tied to conferences just for receiving feedback.
>>>>>
>>>> It's useful to appreciate that it has always been possible to write
>> drafts
>>>> and tech reports and post them - either via direct email, or to lists*
>> for
>>>> discussion or feedback.
>>>>
>>>> *This list in particular is intended for exactly this kind of
>> discussion;
>>>> we are often overrun with CFPs, but they is NOT the primary motivation
>> for
>>>> this list.*
>>>>
>>>> Joe (TCCC Chair)
>>>>
>>>> *it's more useful to post only the abstract, not the full text or PDF
>> FWIW.
>>>> *there are many IEEE Comsoc TCs; it's always useful to post your ideas
>> to
>>>> the TC most specific to your work.
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications
>>> (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication.
>>> Tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
>>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
> _______________________________________________
> IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications
> (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication.
> Tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
>
--
M. Reda Yaich
Chercheur en formation, Phd Student
Multi-Agent Systems
ISCOD - LSTI - Henri Fayol Institute
Ecole Nationale Sup?rieure des Mines
Saint-Etienne
Soyez ?co-responsables !
N'imprimez ce mail qu'en cas de besoin.
More information about the TCCC
mailing list