[Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting open on-line research)
Emmanuel Lochin
emmanuel.lochin
Thu Nov 3 05:17:05 EDT 2011
On 3 November 2011 09:45, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Usman,
>
> The method you are suggesting means that we need to wait 6 months for
> feedback (3-5 reviews).
Hi Pars,
Why do you think it would be faster with your proposal?
I saw that you requested a review for one of your paper, but how long
you expect to get real reviews? I mean, not from your friends,
colleagues or collaborators.
Who is going to stand whether the reviewer is skilled or not?
If the reviewer is not anonymous, who would risk to send a review that
might be qualified as bad by the author or another person?
I think you should clearly expose the rules of your system, I really
do not understand how does it work.
Regards,
Emmanuel
> Pars
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Usman Ashraf <m_usman_ashraf at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ?Dear All,
>>
>> Is there a point that I'm missing? why don't we just submit our work to a
>> reputed journal for feedback?
>> Most reputed journals don't charge anything, don't cost as much as
>> conferences and provide us with a decent feedback.
>>
>> regards
>> Usman.
>>
>> > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:43:11 +0200
>> > From: pars.mutaf at gmail.com
>> > To: touch at isi.edu
>> > CC: tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> > Subject: [Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting open
>> on-line research)
>>
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Could you please send feedback for the following work. I don't want to
>> > submit it to conferences just for feedback. I would therefore need your
>> > opinion:
>> >
>> > http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5115
>> >
>> > Or, please point me to me to a list working on this kind of topic.
>> >
>> > Pars
>> >
>> > PS: Based on the below idea, this is a test for open research.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 11/1/2011 11:37 PM, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>> > > ...
>> > >
>> > > Conferences may have the benefits that are listed above. The problem is
>> > >> being tied to conferences just for receiving feedback.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > It's useful to appreciate that it has always been possible to write
>> drafts
>> > > and tech reports and post them - either via direct email, or to lists*
>> for
>> > > discussion or feedback.
>> > >
>> > > *This list in particular is intended for exactly this kind of
>> discussion;
>> > > we are often overrun with CFPs, but they is NOT the primary motivation
>> for
>> > > this list.*
>> > >
>> > > Joe (TCCC Chair)
>> > >
>> > > *it's more useful to post only the abstract, not the full text or PDF
>> FWIW.
>> > >
>> > > *there are many IEEE Comsoc TCs; it's always useful to post your ideas
>> to
>> > > the TC most specific to your work.
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications
>> > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication.
>> > Tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications
> (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication.
> Tccc at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
>
--
"This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use
or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed"
More information about the TCCC
mailing list